That said, I just simply lost steam around page200. The problem is just that the entire story is so utterly banal and sordid. Most of Clinton'sadversaries are utterly beyond social redemption. There are relatively few meaningful conclusionsthat take more than a few incidents and a couple pages to state (one interesting episode is aforshadowing of the Supreme Court's involvement in the 2000 elections, the appellate court thatruled on whether or not a sitting President could be sued split along party lines - with theRepublicans voting for and Democrats against, in direct opposition to their traditional positions).After reading some 25 pages of descriptions of Linda Tripp and her taping of the remarkably hopelessMonica Lewinsky, one starts to lose their stomach for that sort of thing.
At any rate, this is animportant episode which deserves an honest, straightforward treatment. The only real flaw in thisbook is that it really is about twice as long as it should be. Still, if you can deal with that, itis recommended.
Throughout Whitewater/Travelgate/Paula Jones and the ensuing Monica Lewinsky mess, I wasoverwhelmed by the amount of information, the number of players and the implications they all hadfor our government.
Jeffery Toobin took this jumbled up mess and made sense of it and put into areadable form. And, I must add, he did it with little bias...the only time his feelings are knownis when Ken Starr and his 'elves' use their positions as bully pulpits.
After reading A VASTCONSPIRACY, I believe I understand how deeply the Republicans hated Bill Clinton and to what lenghtsthey would go to oust him from office.
I hope it was worth it to them.
Toobin works his book around two theses:
1. Never before had the judicial system beenused on such grand scale to pursue political goals.
2. No other major political controversy inAmerican history produced as few heroes as this crisis.
Like a clinical pathologist Toobin disectsall the legal cases and arguments and comes to the simple conclusion, which was shared by theAmerican people and indeed by many others world wide, that there was not much to each of the threecases.
The Whitewater case died slowly; it was never proven that the Clintons had done anythingwrong in losing their $ 40.000
The Paula Jones case was viewed at what it was; a lady with quite asexual history who goes up to a hotel room to meet a man with quite a sexual history. Whateverhappened in that room was probably sleazy but did not make up much of a case.
The Lewinsky matterwas all about a consual sexual encounter between two adults. Again, from the President's side sleazyand from a moral point probably inpardonnable but a crime?
The real thing was that Clinton liedabout that...but again what do you expect from a familyman to do. Isn't this what, unfortunatelyhappens in many other marriages as well.
Did Clinton commit perjury? Legal experts have beenfighting about this and it is not clear. Most probably they should not have asked him the questionin the first place.
The use of the judicial system to pusue political goals is painfullydescribed. Time and again cases that are nearly dead are refuelled. Not by a "vast right wingconspiricy" but by all sort of individuals and groups with a grudge against Clinton's politics. Thefive(!) investigations into the death of Vince Forster are a disgrace and makes one really worried (what has this done to his widow and kids?).
All people, Clinton to start with, appear as being inthe game not for the good of the country but for their own miserable selfish needs, be themfinancial, career or whatever. A notable exception is Justice Wright who deserves a statue for herbehavior.
An important question, of course, is whether a man like Clinton as President canprovide the country with the moral leadership which is expected of that high office. It is importantto realize however that whilst the people knew most of the facts of the scandals they have given hima mandate with his re-election. That should have stopped all these cases and investigations.
Mindyou, I think Clinton has not been a good President; the economy has bloomed, that is true but alsonot his doing and I will always remember him for his total absence of moral leadership. But... thisalone is no basis whatsoever for impeachment.
Toobin proves his two theses meticulously anddeserves therefore great credit; he brought the whole range of scandals back to what it was, anumber of very questionnable characters out on personal gain.
Some reviewers say that the AmericanPeople are the great winners with their steadfast viewing of all these allegations as ratherinconsequential and I wholeheartedly agree.
After reading this book we perhaps now should stopreading all the trash which is still published about this period as a silent protest againsteveryone that still tries to use the scandals to pursue their own goals.